[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200311161724.hAGHOILa028887@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: SSH Exploit Request
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 08:30:03 EST, Vladimir Parkhaev said:
> Of course not, but I personally prefer to take a chance (and responsibility)
> for impacting a prod server with gone-wild-ssh-update over being 0wned.
`As do I. Maybe I've just been reading comp.risks for too many years, but what
I objected to was the "it's *perfectly* safe..." attitude that some were
projecting. The older readers on this list probably remember a movie trailer
with the line
"and nothing can possibly go wrong.. go wrong.. go wrong.. go wrong...."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20031116/51fce0db/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists