lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: SSH Exploit Request On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 08:30:03 EST, Vladimir Parkhaev said: > Of course not, but I personally prefer to take a chance (and responsibility) > for impacting a prod server with gone-wild-ssh-update over being 0wned. `As do I. Maybe I've just been reading comp.risks for too many years, but what I objected to was the "it's *perfectly* safe..." attitude that some were projecting. The older readers on this list probably remember a movie trailer with the line "and nothing can possibly go wrong.. go wrong.. go wrong.. go wrong...." -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20031116/51fce0db/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists