full-disclosure - Sidewinder G2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <15533237421C6E4296CC33A2090B224A54C807@UTDEVS02.campus.ad.utdallas.edu>
From: pauls at utdallas.edu (Schmehl, Paul L)
Subject: Sidewinder G2 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ron DuFresne [mailto:dufresne@...ternet.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 9:21 AM
> To: Schmehl, Paul L
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Sidewinder G2 
> 
> 
> >
> > 3) What happens when Sidewinder fails?  Does it fail open?  
> If it does 
> > (and it should), is their version of sendmail still 
> protected?  Or is 
> > it sitting on the Internet bare-ass naked, waiting to be 0wn3d?
> 
> it should fail "closed", preventing any traffic from passing, 
> otherwise you have a door stop.

Maybe your network policy states that, but I would prefer for single
point of failure devices to fail open, rather than closed.  For us,
network availability is a higher priority than protection is.  If the
firewall fails, I don't want the entire network down while we're waiting
for a vendor to fix it.  I'd be surprised if most networks aren't that
way.

Now, if it's something really critical *inside* the network that is
protected by a firewall, then you might want it to fail closed, but at
the edge?

Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/