full-disclosure - Attacks based on predictable process IDs??

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3FC3F481.2000409@hutley.net>
From: brett at hutley.net (Brett Hutley)
Subject: Attacks based on predictable process IDs??

Folks, does anyone know why predictable process IDs are considered harmful?

I can see that there could be the possibility of a compromise if your
cryptographic PRNGs are seeded using a process ID.

Does anyone know of any other types of attacks?

Cheers, Brett
-- 
Brett Hutley [MAppFin,CISSP,SANS GCIH]
mailto:brett@...ley.net
http://hutley.net/brett