full-disclosure - automated vulnerability testing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200311300520.hAU5Kb02011868@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: automated vulnerability testing 

On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 05:55:52 PST, Gadi Evron <ge@...uxbox.org>  said:

> So saying C is not secure is rather.. silly.

I'm willing to assert that Unlambda is impossible to write an
exploitable program:

http://www.eleves.ens.fr:8080/home/madore/programs/unlambda/

:)

(Incidentally, if you're a language theory geek, there's a lot
of really good stuff there - devising something worse than Intercal
takes a LOT of theory background. :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20031130/cfdb3191/attachment.bin