full-disclosure - [Fwd: Bugtraq: Linksys WRT54G Denial of Service Vulnerability]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: tim-security at sentinelchicken.org (Tim)
Subject: [Fwd: Bugtraq: Linksys WRT54G Denial of Service Vulnerability]

If you have one of these pieces of hardware, and you are worried about
the holes in it, why not just patch/replace the binaries yourself:

http://www.batbox.org/wrt54g-linux.html

It took a while for Linksys to release their GPL-ed source, but they
finally gave in to the community (and copyright law).  Now there is a
distro for it and the product has a good deal more utility.

tim


On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 01:41:54AM -0500, Jonathan A. Zdziarski wrote:
> In a lot of cases, this would only be exploitable internally, since many
> configurations are set up not to allow access to the unit externally. 
> But in any case, there are a lot of other ways to DoS these little
> residential boxes.  Running macof (part of the dsniff package) will
> effectively shut down all traffic on the network.  I'm sure arpspoof
> without forwarding would do the same thing.  I'm surprised these things
> don't support something as basic as SSL for authentication (at least the
> model I've got doesn't)
> 
> On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 23:42, Michael Renzmann wrote:
> > Can anyone confirm if technically identical devices such as the Buffalo 
> > WBR-G54 share this vulnerability?
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html