| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200312060218.hB62Itps032461@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: (no subject) On Sat, 06 Dec 2003 11:00:35 +1300, Nick FitzGerald <nick@...us-l.demon.co.uk> said: > First, some genius (or committee thereof) decided that putting > "userinfo" data into URLs would be a good idea. This was decided > despite it generally being agreed -- as the URL RFC authors note _in > the RFC_ -- to be a bad thing from a security perspective... I'm sure the guys at 61.252.126.191 don't give a flying fornicate in a rolling donut about how it's a bad thing from a security perspective, seeing how the PTR for that IP is somewhere in KRNIC.NET controlled space. Or are we now holding scammers to a higher standard of security than the actual site admins? :) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20031205/aaffdd1e/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists