full-disclosure - Re: Internet Explorer URL parsing vulnerability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <005b01c3bf2f$195561e0$a800a8c0@cryo>
From: clint at secureconsulting.com (Clint Bodungen)
Subject: Re: Internet Explorer URL parsing vulnerability

Please see my original post... oh wait... I'll paste it.

I don't really think it will make that much of a difference their profits
considering anyone dumb enough to fall for those scams isn't going to know
the difference between an IP address in the URL box and a "spoofed" domain.
I had a client fall for an eBay scam and the end resulting domain in the URL
box was damn near www.robbingyoublinddamngringo.com.  I can see where a more
effective scam would be, like you hinted at, the infamous microsoft security
update emails.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Feher Tamas" <etomcat@...email.hu>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 2:23 AM
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Internet Explorer URL parsing vulnerability


>
> Unless the bug has already been exploited by malicious people, it was
> a highly irresponsible act to disclose it to the public, without giving
> Microsoft a reasonable timeframe to produce a fix. It may even qualify
> as a crime!
>
> Considering the simplicity of this URL faking trick, it will be certainly
see
> active use by scammers during this Christmas shopping season and
> thousands of people will be robbed of their online banking accounts,
> etc. The money will boost organized crime and the whole society will
> suffer. A patch would give customers at least a theoretical chance to
> protect themselves and the community.
>
> I certainly would not object to ZapDingbat getting sued for a few billion
> bucks by M$ or the US Gov't sending him to a long recreation at
> Guantanamo Bay. People like him discredit security research like
> nothing else and his acts contribute towards legislation that will curb
> people's right to investigate code.
>
> Regards: Tamas Feher.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>