full-disclosure - A new TCP/IP blind data injection technique?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20031213084037.560d66a2.michael@bluesuperman.com>
From: michael at bluesuperman.com (Michael Gale)
Subject: A new TCP/IP blind data injection technique?

Well then .. I am happy that non of the firewalls I use accept or pass
fragments packets.

Michael.

On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 15:04:10 -0500
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:

> On Sat, 13 Dec 2003 03:35:25 MST, Michael Gale
> <michael@...esuperman.com>  said:
> 
> > For example the BorderWare Firewall will not accept fragmented
> > packets, they are working on a firewall function that when
> > fragmented packets arrive. It will save the first piece plus all
> > frags until the final one is received. But the packet back together
> > and do a sanity check of some sort. Then pass or drop the packet.
> 
> So the problem is that the host may re-assemble a fragmented packet
> with injected data in it.
> 
> And we protect against it by.... you got it.. having the firewall
> re-assemble the fragmented packet with injected data and then handing
> the re-assembled full packet (with injected data) to the host.
> 
> Whoops.
>