[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BE95468933894D4D966D724C295E15A202BEF2C6@mcg-ex05.mcgov.org>
From: Sonny.Discini at montgomerycountymd.gov (Discini, Sonny)
Subject: weird worm ?
" don't think so. The examples I've seen here have been nothing but a
string
of nonsense words, with no link or web bug. A probe has to have some
way of
reporting success/failure, and I don't know many systems that bounce
spam
filter failures."
Actually, by default, Symantec's SPAM filter will send a reply to the
sender if an e-mail triggers a rule. This would be the success/failure
reporting that you have mentioned.
-----Original Message-----
From: roy@...t-central.com [mailto:roy@...t-central.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 2:36 PM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] weird worm ?
On Tuesday 30 December 2003 01:33 pm, Discini, Sonny wrote:
> Yes, I have seen similar e-mails and yes, this appears to be word list
> probes to see what will and will not pass through your filter.
I don't think so. The examples I've seen here have been nothing but a
string
of nonsense words, with no link or web bug. A probe has to have some
way of
reporting success/failure, and I don't know many systems that bounce
spam
filter failures. They're much more likely to be attempts to poison
Bayesian
filters.
> This also explains why the e-mail is coming from random sources. If it
> came from a real address, they know that any reasonable admin would
> add the domain to their block list.
That much makes sense.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists