[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <020a01c3d24d$f127ad90$070012ac@schrack.net>
From: rob_schrack at urmc.rochester.edu (Rob Schrack)
Subject: Anyone else exoeriencing blasts o' port 6129 TCP?
Oh yeah... just after Christmas, 6129 accounted for maybe 25% of the packets
we submitted to dshield. In the past 5 days, they've accounted for nearly
1/2 of two million plus packets.
I've been wonderin' if anyone else had been seeing it....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Race" <caferace@...l.com>
To: "LC" <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 12:37 PM
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Anyone else exoeriencing blasts o' port 6129 TCP?
> I noticed some action the previous 48 hours, and on checking logs this
> morning it seems that port 6129 (DameWare Remote Admin) was the common
> factor. ISC seems to have it on the top of their trends list:
>
> http://isc.sans.org/top10.html
>
> hmmmm.
>
> -jim
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists