[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20040105063458.C71DE42F3B@maja.zesoi.fer.hr>
From: Bojan.Zdrnja at LSS.hr (Bojan Zdrnja)
Subject: Show me the Virrii!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of
> Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
> Sent: Monday, 5 January 2004 4:58 p.m.
> To: Harry Hoffman
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Show me the Virrii!
>
> > Not to protect against known virii would be negligent and lazy which is
why most
> > modern OS's provide these "fixes" as patches to eventually become part
of the
> > main OS.
>
> My point was that if the goal is to provide actual protection for the end
user
> rather than something that looks good next to a ruler, you quickly reach a
> point of diminishing returns in trying to include more signatures. At
some
That's why people "invented" in-the-wild list (although it's not 100%
correct always and lagging).
Detection of zoo collections in most cases will get you only better
marketing (our product detects 123240294 viruses).
Cheers,
Bojan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists