| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200401132054.34268.ka@khidr.net> From: ka at khidr.net (Ka) Subject: Professional Groups At Dienstag, 13. Januar 2004 19:06 James.Cupps@...pi.com wrote: > All of the arguments for unionizing have centered around job security and > control of direction in the company to make life better. No, not all, mine for example not. > Now I have to ask what does any of this do with Info Security let alone > vulnerability exposure? The IT security specialist being "owned" socially has nothing to do with security? I must be dreaming. That whole discussion about off-topic and what should be allowed to discuss in this list is not proof enough? The scissors are already installed in our heads. -- snip -- Ka -- r00ted systems tend to get patched so that no other can come in, apparently they are invulnerable -- afterwards.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists