full-disclosure - Flawed arguments (Was all that other crap about PFW day)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <15533237421C6E4296CC33A2090B224A54C9E9@UTDEVS02.campus.ad.utdallas.edu>
From: pauls at utdallas.edu (Schmehl, Paul L)
Subject: Flawed arguments (Was all that other crap about PFW day)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik van Straten [mailto:emvs.fd.3FB4D11C@....tn.tudelft.nl] 
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 10:39 AM
> To: Schmehl, Paul L
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Flawed arguments (Was all that 
> other crap about PFW day)
> 
> *I* [1] complained that PFW's fool people into thinking that 
> they are more secure - an idea you reject *AND* support in 
> the same post [2] clearly shown in [3]
>
Well, you've certainly master the art of entirely missing the point.
 
Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/