full-disclosure - Religion... was RE: Re: January 15 is Personal Firewall Day, help the cause

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200401182006.i0IK6lpH011778@ms-smtp-03-eri0.texas.rr.com>
From: mailinglists at wjnconsulting.com (Wes Noonan)
Subject: Religion... was RE: Re: January 15 is Personal Firewall Day, help the cause

My bad. I thought it would have been clear that I was trying to make the
point that it is about more than just protecting against old threats, rather
it is primarily about protecting against the new and unknown threats.
Protecting against the known is easy. Protecting against the unknown is the
tricky part. 

I should have clarified it better for the pedantic by inserting "isn't just"
in there.

Thanks.

Wes Noonan
mailinglists@...consulting.com
http://www.wjnconsulting.com 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com [mailto:full-disclosure-
> admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Jeremiah Cornelius
> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 13:20
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: Religion... was RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: January 15 is
> Personal Firewall Day, help the cause
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Sunday 18 January 2004 08:51, Wes Noonan wrote:
> > Security isn't about protecting against old threats; it's about
> protecting
> > against new threats.
> 
> Oh. O.K.
> 
> I think that statement is unsupportable.
> 
> > Security is about a total process, not a specific product
> > or application.
> 
> Yes. That makes sense, and reflects awareness of the field.  Both
> statements
> in the same paragraph is dissonant.  It makes whatever point your tring to
> make seem like a string of /non-sequiturs/...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFACtx8Ji2cv3XsiSARAvkQAJ93u+2mooEUKXhq0GDEm2arAERZRQCePLQq
> s4zW2Ey3WW7O6A2HpKtP4R0=
> =f+LS
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html