| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200401182347.i0INlKnZ016552@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu) Subject: [inbox] Re: Anti-MS drivel On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 18:20:54 EST, joe <mvp@...ware.net> said: > imply are common place for you. Not one restore from backup ever. Our AD has > failures and the directory stops replicating to protect itself. We fix the > disk subsystem failure, reload the machine, repromote, and it is up and Am I missing something here regarding the difference between a restore and a reload? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 226 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040118/4afd3711/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists