[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200401190351.i0J3pCpH014104@ms-smtp-03-eri0.texas.rr.com>
From: mailinglists at wjnconsulting.com (Wes Noonan)
Subject: Religion... was RE: Re: January 15 is Personal Firewall Day, help the cause
I agree completely. I thought I had been abundantly clear that this was my
position in all of this.
I also think this thread has likely run its course short of new information.
Wes Noonan
mailinglists@...consulting.com
http://www.wjnconsulting.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Marshall [mailto:mmarshall112@...cast.net]
> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 21:38
> To: 'David F. Skoll'; 'Wes Noonan'
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: RE: Religion... was RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: January 15 is
> Personal Firewall Day, help the cause
>
> Can we please just stop OS-based arguments? And can we agree that all OSs
> earn their places, rightfully? Windows has earned very few security
> points
> to date (and maybe none), but we can move toward securing this OS despite
> its programming shortcomings. Windows, and thankfully, linux isn't going
> away any time soon. Linux installs mostly secure by default, windows
> installs insecure by default, but that doesn't mean people can't harden
> either OS and make it more secure.
>
> Personaly, I've run a large data center using both OSs (various versions)
> securely for over 5 years. I've developend and implemented windows and
> linux hardening templates. There are many ways to secure and harden both.
> As many have pointed out, layers matter.
>
> Mike
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists