full-disclosure - Dig SCO?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F05ADDBF9@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk>
From: John.Airey at rnib.org.uk (John.Airey@...b.org.uk)
Subject: Dig SCO?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Bliss [mailto:james.bliss@...cast.net]
> Sent: 03 February 2004 05:46
> To: Full-Disclosure Full-Disclosure
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Dig SCO?
> 
> 
> On Monday 02 February 2004 23:24, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 22:56:24 CST, James Bliss 
> <james.bliss@...cast.net>  
> said:
> > > I have a question, has anyone documented the number, 
> volume, any metrics
> > > of the number of packets actually going to sco.com?  
> Possibly the source
> > > IPs as well to see if it is scattered or centralized on a 
> few boxes.
> >
> > Gonna be somewhere between diddly and squat, considering they yanked
> > www.sco.com out of the DNS. :)
> 
> I guess I should have been more precise, how many requests 
> were/are actually 
> being directed at sco.com by mydoom?  Yeah, I realized they 
> took it out of 
> the DNS, but I was wondering if it was:
> 1)  Because they actually were being flooded with requests
> 2)  It was a precaution, but no evidence that it happened
> 3)  If precaution, was it justified or merely for 'theatrics' 
>  (Of course it 
> could have always been both).

Netcraft have been monitoring www.sco.com for some time.
http://news.netcraft.com gives the latest details. They offer an interesting
story of the pragmatism of Microsoft, who have used Linux servers run by
Akamai in the past to keep their home page up. So much for a cancer on
intellectual property, eh?

SCO had set the TTL on their home page to 60 seconds (compared to the 3600
or one hour on www.microsoft.com). That itself would have generated even
more DNS traffic.

- 
John Airey, BSc (Jt Hons), CNA, RHCE
Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute of the
Blind,
Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU,
Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 John.Airey@...b.org.uk 

Even if you win the rat race, that will still only make you a rat.

- 
DISCLAIMER: 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system. 

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by 
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. 

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent 
those of RNIB. 

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk