full-disclosure - credibility (was 'more security people')

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <01e301c3eb77$55d0d1d0$8c02a8c0@Constant>
From: jeremiah at nur.net (Jeremiah Cornelius)
Subject: credibility (was 'more security people')

<SNIPPAGE>
> There should be a hands-on challenge to any security certification
> requirements.  Perhaps something like: "Find and infiltrate the PaX
> protected system on network X.  You must write your own exploit to gain
> root through ssh using return-into-libc.  Remove all traces of your
> intrusion from the logs (they're append only).  Don't alert the Snort
> box." 
> 
> I don't have a CISSP btw so I'm biased.
> 

Yeah.  Give me 6 to 9 months on that one, guy!

Your point is well taken - but I think that someone who is able outline the issues from scratch (as you have just done here) is good enough on the issues side to contribute in a meaningful way.

So - how many unpublished roots to ssh do you have, anyway? ;-)