[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40253773.4000006@snosoft.com>
From: dotslash at snosoft.com (KF)
Subject: (no subject)
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 11:05:38 EST, KF <dotslash@...soft.com> said:
>
>>Use a friggin subject line fools!
>
>
> OK.. I'll bite. What subject line do you recommend for pointless
mail? ;)
I could care less... so long as it is something relating to the email
that is being sent. When you have 3 people posting (no subejct)
conversations talking about different things its obviously hard to follow.
Searching my inbox as an example I have one that was from
1[at]malware.com perhaps should have been titled "Quite a nifty email
scam ", Some weird poem from auto33661[at]hush.ai that could have been
titled "To those who are in love ", One from jkuperus[at]planet.nl that
could be "Minor IE System Info Disclosure".
Its really NOT that big of a deal... certainly didn't think it required
much discussion. Just a pet peave in regards to following threads.
/end of conversation - no need for more un necessary traffic.
-KF
Powered by blists - more mailing lists