[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20040208215236.GA21824@piper.madduck.net>
From: madduck at madduck.net (martin f krafft)
Subject: Re: another product affected by recent MS IE '@' patch
also sprach Nick FitzGerald <nick@...us-l.demon.co.uk> [2004.02.08.2108 +0100]:
> Actually, it is _far_ from a _typical_ MS fix.
thanks for your reply, it made me check out rfc 1630 and, tataa,
user:pass@...ver/url is non-standard. thus, this is in fact the most
surprising fix from M$ in a long time.
> Second, it is very unlike MS to "fix" something when they know it will
> break some systems based on the "broken" behaviour.
unless of course it could harm competitors. then they will gladly do
so.
> > ... and absolutely ridiculous), ...
>
> Ahhhh -- so you're another genius who believes it is "ridiculous" to
> implement standards-conforming behavior? Or are you another genius who
> believes it is ridiculous for MS to implement improved security
> behaviour in its historically insecure web browser?
>
> Or perhaps you believe _both_ changes are ridiculous?
i retract my statement. i wrote that message on the train without
access to the RFC. i should have known better.
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@...duck
invalid/expired pgp subkeys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
"marriage is the only adventure open to the cowardly."
-- voltaire
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040208/a3ed9a80/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists