[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1BA3F721BF11934F841821B5B1C4F1556A44FF@101exchange.101com.com>
From: keith.ward at mcpmag.com (Keith Ward)
Subject: RE: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject))
Who are you? You don't even provide your name. I'm frankly surprised
that Roberta gave you as detailed a reply as she did; I wouldn't have
wasted my keystrokes. Now, if you'd prefer to have a civilized debate,
instead of throwing out insults (rank amateur gibberish comes to mind),
we can talk. Otherwise, we don't have much to say to each other.
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: http-equiv@...ite.com [mailto:1@...ware.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 12:32 AM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Cc: Roberta Bragg; Keith Ward; Roberta Bragg
Subject: Security Watch Essay (was: (no subject))
How many of these little essays are you going to publish? Who
will decide which one[s] gets published. Will it be the only
one that you can reply to that you feel you can score points
against. Who are you and what is your claim to fame? You
certainly showed your audience with your response 'directly to
the authors' of "Cyberinsecurity: The Cost of Monopoly. How the
Dominance of Microsoft Products Poses a Risk to Security."
http://www.mcpmag.com/newsletter/article.asp?EditorialsID=170
I take it that in the healthy debate than ensued the authors of
that little piece clarified their position to your satisfaction.
Why has your boss sent you? What ails him that he is incapable
of posting this little "challenge" of his himself?
It appears that the "security watch" newsletter is published
only to / by Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine Online
why have you tried to suggest that the "JAVA publication, a
couple for the Feds, some for education market" will be the
audience of this as well.
What do you mean you are not an employee? "Security Watch" is
your column. Perhaps you do it for free in order to generate
goodwill amongst the subscribers of your magazine, who all no
doubt have a vested interested in everything Microsoft. Then
with a bit of luck they'll end up buying your book[s]?
Roberta Bragg, MCSE: Security, CISSP, Security+ and contributing
editor for MCP Magazine, runs Have Computer Will Travel Inc., an
independent firm specializing in security, operating systems and
databases. She's a frequent speaker and trainer for TechMentor.
Her newest book is MCSA/MCSE Implementing and Administering
Security in a Windows 2000 Network Exam Cram 2 (Exam Cram 70-
214) by Que Publishing. You can contact Roberta
about "Psychologically Acceptable Security" at .
"If you believe that Security Watch is a pro-Microsoft
publication " -- nice try. It's precisely this rank amateur
gibberish that Microsoft employees along with its little elves
that defines it's inability to do anything right.
Microsoft Certified Professional Magazine Online:
<meta name="description" content="Microsoft Certified
Professional Magazine brings you the latest independent
information on Microsoft products and MCP certification programs
and is relied upon by Windows, SQL Server and .NET experts
worldwide."><meta name="keywords" content="Microsoft, MCSE, MCP,
MCSD, MCP, MCSA, MCDBA, MCT, 2003, Windows, NT, XP, RSS, XML,
Certification, IT, Salary, Engineer, Windows, Internet,
Certify, Exam, Test, Network, Office, Magazine, Computer, .NET,
Online">
The "Security Watch" column inside the "Microsoft Certified
Professional Magazine" catering [and relied upon mindyou]to
Windows, SQL Server and .NET experts worldwide is not 'pro'
[whatver that is supposed to mean] Microsoft.
Get your boss out of his Microsoft logo'd Lazy Boy recliner and
post and run his debate here. On this mailing list. Where it can
be debated. Not addressed in reply one time like you did before.
And he can donate his not inconsiderable sum of a grand total
of "$50.00" to the SPCA.
Ridiculous.
--
http://www.malware.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists