| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200402122306.41150.goreBOFH@comcast.net> From: goreBOFH at comcast.net (Allen/gore/SlackWareWolf) Subject: Re: W2K source "leaked"? I think they should release the source for NT anyway. They are pretty much dropping it, and they say it is so badly made they can hardly fix it, well, why not let the REAL hackers out there who can make an OS, take a look at it. Maybe they are a little nervouse? Maybe people would see it was badly made? Wither way I know ALOT of people who STILL swear by NT. With proper skill, NT can be made hard. 2,000 is similar, and I think it would be great if they finally said "Ok, fine, here is the source". -- __________________________________________________ We Are 138 http://www.suse.com http://www.slackware.org http://www.bsd.org http://www.daemonnews.org/ http://www.cannibalholocaust.net http://www.misfits.com http://www.onethirtyeight.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists