[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <002d01c3f232$b3e8f060$6500a8c0@D96VHQ31>
From: mroetto at cox.net (Mike Roetto)
Subject: Re: W2K source "leaked"?
The source is widely available on the P2P networks now. Will anyone have
the courage to admit downloading a copy so they can give us a scoop on
what's inside the archive? From the filename manifest that was published,
it certainly seem enticing.
-mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "sil" <jesus@...urrected.us>
To: "Gadi Evron" <ge@...tistical.reprehensible.net>
Cc: <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>; <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>; "Thor
Larholm" <thor@...x.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 6:42 PM
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Re: W2K source "leaked"?
>
> This is the CNET article going up.
>
> http://news.com.com/2100-7349_3-5158496.html
>
> Again, I don't know/care if this is true of MS' source code being posted,
> and I too smell something fishy in the air with this whole 'story' coming
> out. Considering there is supposedly 600mb's or so of alleged code, but
> unless MS says something, I wouldn't know what to think of it.
>
>
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Gadi Evron wrote:
>
> >
> > Can anyone confirm this is the real source code? How about a press
> > release? :)
> >
> > Gadi Evron
> >
> >
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> "The most tyrannical of governments are those which make
> crimes of opinions, for everyone has an inalienable
> right to his thoughts." -- Benedict Spinoza
>
>
> //sil
>
> http://www.kungfunix.net http://www.politrix.org
> http://www.infiltrated.net http://bush.shafted.us
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists