full-disclosure - RE: W2K source "leaked"?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F05ADDCB2@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk>
From: John.Airey at rnib.org.uk (John.Airey@...b.org.uk)
Subject: RE: W2K source "leaked"?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Georgi Guninski [mailto:guninski@...inski.com]
> Sent: 13 February 2004 12:54
> To: webheadport80@...scape.net
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: W2K source "leaked"?
> 
> 
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,5264,00.asp
> Allchin: Disclosure May Endanger U.S.
> By Caron Carlson
> May 13, 2002 	
> 
> 
> A senior Microsoft Corp. executive told a federal court last week that
> sharing information with competitors could damage national 
> security and even
> threaten the U.S. war effort in Afghanistan. He later 
> acknowledged that some
> Microsoft code was so flawed it could not be safely disclosed.
> 
> hahaha
> 
> georgi
> 
Are all Hungarian's as cruel as you? (That's a rhetorical question of
course).

Now, imagine if the US Federal Government considered Windows so insecure
that it was a threat to their national security (from the words of the
company itself. I coudln't remember who said it, so thanks for that)? As a
consequence they installed "something else" on the desktop. Serious coronary
time for Microsoft I would say.

On a vaguely related point, I hope most people realise that the main reason
for extending Windows 98 support was the number of people who are still
using it. It will have been supplied up till the end of 2002, so users of
hardware with a three year warranty (eg Dell customers) will be hoping to
keep using it till 2005. Would it help Microsoft if they forced these people
onto alternatives? Of course not, because they would be unlikely to come
back.

I do wonder if Microsoft will ever take into account OEM agreements when
they decide their "end of life" dates. Probably never.

- 
John Airey, BSc (Jt Hons), CNA, RHCE
Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute of the
Blind,
Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU,
Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 John.Airey@...b.org.uk 

According to the book of Acts, Eutychus was the first man to suffer from a
General Protection Fault with Windows.

- 
DISCLAIMER: 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system. 

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by 
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. 

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent 
those of RNIB. 

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk