full-disclosure - RE: W2K source "leaked"?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.58.0402131830520.13798@vinland.freeshell.org>
From: ypwhich at paunix.org (ypwhich)
Subject: RE: W2K source "leaked"? 

<laughs> ... silly as that may seem, I wouldn't put it past them...

-ypwhich

On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:

> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:21:09 -0500
> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
> To: Georgi Guninski <guninski@...inski.com>
> Cc: webheadport80@...scape.net, full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] RE: W2K source "leaked"?
>
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:53:42 +0200, Georgi Guninski said:
>
> > A senior Microsoft Corp. executive told a federal court last week that
> > sharing information with competitors could damage national security and even
> > threaten the U.S. war effort in Afghanistan. He later acknowledged that some
> > Microsoft code was so flawed it could not be safely disclosed.
>
> Anybody want to place bets that *some* idiot is going to try to blame our
> failure to find Osama bin Laden on the source code leak?
>