[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200402271529.i1RFT5fL020182@caligula.anu.edu.au>
From: avalon at caligula.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed)
Subject: And how long have buffer overflows been aro
Maybe they're referring to Windows NT having a heritage of core design
from people who worked on VMS (which does predate the Internet.)
In some mail from "Ng, Kenneth (US)", sie said:
>
> What quantum universe is this guy coming from? I don't know the start of
> the internet, but the date on the telnet RFC 318 is April 3, 1972 (
> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc318.html ) According to Microsoft's own time
> line ( http://www.microsoft.com/windows/WinHistoryProGraphic.mspx ) Windows
> NT started in 1993. Maybe they consider the start of the internet in Al
> Gore terms?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com]On Behalf Of Edward W.
> Ray
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 7:51 PM
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] And how long have buffer overflows been
> around?
>
>
> A lot longer than just before Windows 2003 release, but not according to
> Security Architect and Chief Technology Officer of Microsoft's Security
> Business Unit David Aucsmith:
>
>
> "Windows 95 was written without a single security feature, he said, as it
> was designed to be totally open to let users connect to other systems.
> Furthermore, the security kernel of the Windows NT server software was
> written before the Internet, and the Windows Server 2003 software was
> written before buffer overflows became a frequent target of recent
> attacks..."
>
>
> The rest of the article can be found at
> http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/02/24/HNunderattack_1.html
>
>
> A little levity for today's discussion.
>
> Edward W. Ray
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>
> *****************************************************************************
> The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.
> It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else
> is unauthorized.
>
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
> or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited
> and may be unlawful. When addressed to our clients any opinions or advice
> contained in this email are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in
> the governing KPMG client engagement letter.
> *****************************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists