full-disclosure - [OT] Re: Knocking Microsoft

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402271723140.24027@zen.timetraveller.org>
From: robert at timetraveller.org (Robert Brockway)
Subject: [OT] Re: Knocking Microsoft

On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, James P. Saveker wrote:

> Microsoft has and how poor this is.  As everybody subscribing to this list
> and similar zone-h, bugtraq etc will know Linux has many warnings posted
> also.  Yet I rarely hear people talking about that and indeed how it is far
> more difficult to keep linux distro's up to date.  Windows has a far greater

% apt-get update && apt-get upgrade

Want to install apache-ssl?

% apt-get install apache-ssl

All dependencies (including security updates) taken care of.

Yeah you're right, that was hard :)

Try Debian GNU/Linux and tell me again that Linux is hard to maintain.
Most OS development teams/companies should aspire for their OSes to be
half as easy to maintain as Debian.

Cheers,
	Rob