full-disclosure - A new look at PGP (WAS: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <40402382.4060301@dok.org>
From: solo at dok.org (Troy Solo)
Subject: A new look at PGP (WAS: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG)
 vs.	S/MIME)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In my opinion, it would be too easy to create false "Webs of Trust"
through something like Orkut.  I personally have people on my friends
list that I've never actually met in person.

/**************************/
/*       Troy Solo        */
/*     <solo@....org>     */
/*  Ignotum per Ignotius  */
/**************************/



Harry Hoffman wrote:
| That brings up an interesting question. Does anyone out there think
that PGP
| "web of trusts" would be easier if encorporated into something like
"Orkut" or
| "Friendster"?
|
| Obviously, those types of sites would need to evolve (change) it order
to more
| easily facilitate a trust but it could possibly be doable.
|
| Just a thought,
| Harry
|
| Quoting Kurt Seifried <listuser@...fried.org>:
|
| *>
| *> This thread is dead. It was dead when it was started. It was dead 3
years
| *> ago.
| *>
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAQCOCmaXTPtvAkS0RAvKbAKCILDCAUry8AqfU5iU5mAEl03p/tgCdEVEz
WUPqGsAAYs5roBFq1nfr0i8=
=cGqG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----