[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20040228122110.GA21153@piper.madduck.net>
From: madduck at madduck.net (martin f krafft)
Subject: Re: Knocking Microsoft
also sprach James F. Wilkus <james@...xninja.us> [2004.02.28.0117 +0100]:
> This is not true. UNIX was not made to be secure. Any UNIX security
> history book will tell you that.
I think that having a clear separation between user and admin in
UNIX, as well as the concept of homedirectories already take a big
step towards security. I agree that UNIX per se isn't secure. But
it's way better designed than Windoze.
> apt-get update is easy, so is clicking on windows update...
Except apt-get does not require a reboot, and patches are available
within hours.
> I think people are doing a disservice by claiming that linux
> is something it is not, or more accurately, generalizing all
> UNIX's to be secure.
of course, a system is only as secure as its admin. but windoze
admins are going to have to learn some more stuff before they can
administer linux. unfortunately, redhat and suse are pushing the
other way...
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@...duck
invalid/expired pgp subkeys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Most Intelligent Customers Realise Our Software Only Fools Them.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040228/fd1080fb/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists