full-disclosure - Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20040228210754.GZ22426@uriel.eclipsed.net>
From: gr at eclipsed.net (gabriel rosenkoetter)
Subject: Re: OpenPGP (GnuPG) vs. S/MIME

On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 03:23:42PM -0700, Ben Nelson wrote:
> I'd like to open a discussion about PGP vs. S/MIME .

That's lovely, but how does it pertain to the full disclosure of
system security problems?

This isn't the right place for this conversation. Either Perry
Metzger's cryptography list or cypherpunks (if you can still find an
active node) would be the right place.

-- 
gabriel rosenkoetter
gr@...ipsed.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040228/48099f8e/attachment.bin