lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <000001c3ff5d$c2c52fd0$0201a8c0@fosi> From: steve.wray at paradise.net.nz (Steve Wray) Subject: [OT] Re: Knocking Microsoft > [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Tim > Sent: Monday, 1 March 2004 18:33 > > > First of all, why would you do this? Secondly, it won't work because the > > port will simply tell you that it's already installed and suggest you > > uninstall the previous version first. > > Well, it didn't used to. And if you HAVE to uninstall the old port > before compiling the new one... isn't that already broken? How long > does it take to compile Apache? You want your servers down that long? > Once again, I am going on old information, but back then, it was > rediculous how short-sighted some of the ports scripts were. I hate to butt into this thread but compiling apache on your primary web server, even having a compiler on an internet exposed machine, is just plain daft. Surely this OS (FreeBSD, IIRC) wouldn't require such lunacy?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists