full-disclosure - Counter-Attacking hackers? Is this really a good idea?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200403081005.35306.jstewart@lurhq.com>
From: jstewart at lurhq.com (Joe Stewart)
Subject: Counter-Attacking hackers? Is this really a good idea?

On Monday 08 March 2004 9:06 am, Harlan Carvey wrote:
> Oddly enough, this *has* been discussed...at length.
> That doesn't mean that it's not worth discussing
> more...

Here's one of the better papers I have seen on the ethics of the 
counter-hack. And I'm not just saying that because a friend wrote it :)

http://www.lurhq.com/ethics.html

-Joe

-- 
Joe Stewart, GCIH 
Senior Security Researcher
LURHQ http://www.lurhq.com/