lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <86ptbkicum.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> From: merlyn at stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) Subject: Comcast using IPS to protect the Internet from their home user clients? >>>>> "Exibar" == Exibar <exibar@...lair.com> writes: Exibar> I know the "feeling" behind what you typed, but you really Exibar> don't mean what you typed. Filtering should not be done by Exibar> the ISPs, they should provide a pipe, and that's it. But they also have the right/responsibility to enforce an AUP, and to play "good net neighbor". In this case, they are disconnecting users who are violating AUPs or causing them to collectively no longer play "good net neighbor". It's not censorship. It's especially not "censorship" when it's a private company (you can always take your business elsewhere). "Freedom of the press" doesn't mean you get to use everyone's press for free, or that everyone gets a free press. Comcast is entirely within their right to cut people off as clients or from the net or both. It's their wires. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@...nehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists