lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <FLEKIFICBHEGCHAICFAJGEGLCPAA.fulldisclosure@mnbn.net>
From: fulldisclosure at mnbn.net (Matthew C. Beckman)
Subject: Comcast using IPS to protect the Internetfrom their home user clients?

> But, if those terms aren't acceptable, then why sign up for the
> service in the first place?

I think the objection is simply that Comcast won't define the terms.
As someone else mentioned, there are a lot of reports of Comcast
cutting off service to someone with the reason being, that they
over-used the service.  If they are advertising unlimited internet
service first off, and then won't define what 'too much' bandwidth
usage is, that is where the problem comes in.  Even those people that
have been cut off have been unable to find out where that line is
drawn.

If they would be more clear in their policies, I don't think anyone
would have room to complain.

- Matthew C. Beckman


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ