[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1078982524.490.54.camel@localhost>
From: frank at knobbe.us (Frank Knobbe)
Subject: Comcast using IPS to protect the
Internetfrom their home user clients?
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 22:50, Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh] wrote:
> i think you and i just said the same things, by traffic thresholds i
> ment total traffic, so it includes all your tunneled ones also, but as
> this is pure speculation and speculation is something that is not good
> so i will let this thread die here
Oh, okay, I see what you meant. I don't think that's the case since I
had higher traffic volumes (for example, scp'ing a tar backup of a
remote server). Also, whisker scans ran fine. Pretty much same volume,
same hosts.
Regards,
Frank
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040310/f87371ba/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists