lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <008801c40aac$3d04e480$6700a8c0@D5JJ2W0J> From: aallamaa at yahoo.fr (Abdelkader ALLAM) Subject: a secure base system -> ADAMANTIX Hello, I would recommend Adamantix (http://www.adamantix.org) aka Trusted Debian (http://www.trusteddebian.org) , which features RSBAC and PaX. Adamantix aims to be a distribution that is hard to crack, but not hard to use. In other words, highly-secure (its target is Common Criteria LSPP AEL 5 or higher) but usable. This solution is based on Debian. Regards, Abdelkader ALLAM -----Message d'origine----- De?: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] De la part de Fabrice MARIE Envoy??: lundi 15 mars 2004 13:34 ??: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com Cc?: harry Objet?: Re: [Full-Disclosure] a secure base system Hello, On Monday 15 March 2004 19:37, harry wrote: > hi all, > i have a little question. i'm asked to set up a base system, which has > to be secure. we want a system from which we can easily install a > compromised system. so i had a few ideas to make it as secure and yet as > usable as possible: > [...] > ==> is this ok, too paranoia or is there somenting i'm missing, and > cound it be even more safe? > [...] I would recommend you to use RSBAC (http://www.rsbac.org/) if you want even more tight security. Have a nice day, Fabrice. -- Fabrice A. MARIE FMA Risk Management Solutions http://www.fma-rms.com/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists