full-disclosure - Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <E075A187B11EED409B12D00100CAAD6639F2@ntserver.meltemi.local>
From: Jos at meltemi.co.uk (Jos Osborne)
Subject: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?

>It doesn't address the issue. The requirement is that some MS customers need
>to patch without putting the machine on the internet. For whatever reasons.
>
>Is that such an unreasonable request?
>
>Geo.

Sorry to sound incredibly dense, but if the machine in question is never being connected to a network does it really need securing/patching?

Jos