lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <E075A187B11EED409B12D00100CAAD6639F2@ntserver.meltemi.local>
From: Jos at meltemi.co.uk (Jos Osborne)
Subject: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?

>It doesn't address the issue. The requirement is that some MS customers need
>to patch without putting the machine on the internet. For whatever reasons.
>
>Is that such an unreasonable request?
>
>Geo.

Sorry to sound incredibly dense, but if the machine in question is never being connected to a network does it really need securing/patching?

Jos


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ