lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F05ADDE35@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk> From: John.Airey at rnib.org.uk (John.Airey@...b.org.uk) Subject: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? > -----Original Message----- > From: Geo. [mailto:geoincidents@...info.org] > Sent: Wednesday, 17 March 2004 16:12 > To: Simon Richter; Geoincidents > Cc: Daniele Muscetta; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com > Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ? > > > >>Hrm, how about inventing an option (at install time) that > places a very > restrictive firewall on the network connection by default, say, only > outgoing port 80 to windowsupdate.com (or even better, only let it > establish a secure tunnel there), so you can patch and then loosen the > firewall settings after that?<< > > It doesn't address the issue. The requirement is that some MS > customers need > to patch without putting the machine on the internet. For > whatever reasons. > > Is that such an unreasonable request? > > Geo. >From experience, you can't just lock down to that one server. You need to allow port 80 and 443 access to different servers. Each day the list of servers changes because of the Akamai caching that is used. I spend some time configuring locked down systems to be able to talk to them. So yes, it is an unreasonable request. On the other hand, access to Red Hat Network needs only one port and one IP address. No doubt there's some serious load-balancing going on in the background. - John Airey, BSc (Jt Hons), CNA, RHCE Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute of the Blind, Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU, Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 John.Airey@...b.org.uk Shameless movie plug - go see the Passion of the Christ! - DISCLAIMER: NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system. RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
Powered by blists - more mailing lists