[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F05ADDE35@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk>
From: John.Airey at rnib.org.uk (John.Airey@...b.org.uk)
Subject: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geo. [mailto:geoincidents@...info.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 March 2004 16:12
> To: Simon Richter; Geoincidents
> Cc: Daniele Muscetta; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?
>
>
> >>Hrm, how about inventing an option (at install time) that
> places a very
> restrictive firewall on the network connection by default, say, only
> outgoing port 80 to windowsupdate.com (or even better, only let it
> establish a secure tunnel there), so you can patch and then loosen the
> firewall settings after that?<<
>
> It doesn't address the issue. The requirement is that some MS
> customers need
> to patch without putting the machine on the internet. For
> whatever reasons.
>
> Is that such an unreasonable request?
>
> Geo.
>From experience, you can't just lock down to that one server. You need to
allow port 80 and 443 access to different servers. Each day the list of
servers changes because of the Akamai caching that is used. I spend some
time configuring locked down systems to be able to talk to them. So yes, it
is an unreasonable request.
On the other hand, access to Red Hat Network needs only one port and one IP
address. No doubt there's some serious load-balancing going on in the
background.
-
John Airey, BSc (Jt Hons), CNA, RHCE
Internet systems support officer, ITCSD, Royal National Institute of the
Blind,
Bakewell Road, Peterborough PE2 6XU,
Tel.: +44 (0) 1733 375299 Fax: +44 (0) 1733 370848 John.Airey@...b.org.uk
Shameless movie plug - go see the Passion of the Christ!
-
DISCLAIMER:
NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it
and any attachments from your system.
RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it
cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.
Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of RNIB.
RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227
Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
Powered by blists - more mailing lists