full-disclosure - Re: Administrivia

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1079672846.488.148.camel@localhost>
From: frank at knobbe.us (Frank Knobbe)
Subject: Re: Administrivia

On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 19:08, Jason wrote:
> but *I* prefer to be in the recipient list if I have joined in on the 
> discussion, it is clearly a discussion I am interested in or felt like 
> chiming in on. I have filters... they filter... they filter differently 
> if I am a named to or cc... discussions I am participating in by default 
> float to my attention.

In addition, a discussion between 2 or 3 parties can take place faster
if they email themselves directly as opposed to wait for a sluggish mail
list to deliver the posting 6 hours later. Personally, I prefer to be
cc'ed as well. If I want to unlink from a discussion, I'll the
participants know.

There is no absolute answer to this problem, like in much of security.
It's a decision where each and everyone of us has to apply something
special.... common sense.

Regards,
Frank

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040318/73059938/attachment.bin