lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0403191014390.18358-100000@tundra.winternet.com> From: dufresne at winternet.com (Ron DuFresne) Subject: Re: Administrivia [SNIP] > > > Except I would add that the quoted RFC (which is informational, not > mandatory) does say that signatures should be kept short: > > - If you include a signature keep it short. Rule of thumb > is no longer than 4 lines. Remember that many people pay for > connectivity by the minute, and the longer your message is, > the more they pay. > > The observant will note that mine breaks this advice (although it doesn't if > you ignore the extra bit that I put in. It usually offends at least one > person). The RNIB disclaimer is outside my control, except that I have > pointed out that it can lead to our own email being classed as SPAM and > suggested a link to a web page would be better. > I avoid the issue of required .sig/banners by not posting to lists via my work e-mail. Course that requires one has ssh access to another system. I tend to use two different personal accounts for mailing lists for the most part. Then again I've a .sig just over spec... Thanks, Ron DuFresne ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart ***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!*** OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists