full-disclosure - When do exploits get used?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: lscharf at aoe.vt.edu (Luke Scharf)
Subject: When do exploits get used?

On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 14:46, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> To think otherwise is foolish, as I said.  If one isn't paranoid, one 
> probably doesn't belong in the security field.  If you're sitting back 
> thinking you're safe because you're patched and you patch quickly, then 
> you're unalert and exposed.

Patching, passwords, and basic-permissions *are*, however, the 10% of
the work that gets 90% of the benefit.  All the stuff that we get
excited about here is just icing on the cake.

-Luke

-- 
Luke Scharf, Systems Administrator
Virginia Tech Aerospace and Ocean Engineering