lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0403240414430.5438@suse.bluegenesis.com> From: todd at hostopia.com (Todd Burroughs) Subject: viruses being sent to this list On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Steve Wray wrote: > Actually, I am really glad of this thread. > > Its evidence that something between me and the list > is filtering out viruses. > > My ISP *swears* that it isn't them. I'm all for an *open* network, I want raw Internet. If my ISP starts "filtering" things for me, I'd probably switch ISPs. They can offer it to me, but I want a choice. They can default it "on", but I want a choice to turn it off. I don't use Windows but if I did, I would find a safer mail client and not click on stupid things. I like getting viruses, I have to ensure that our virus scan system works, so it's nice that I get 5 to 10 of them a day. If I see one that gets though, I know something's wrong. One problem with doing any kind of filtering is that, as a common carrier (i.e., the list owners just running a distribution system), you could become legally liable for the content because now you are inspecting it and deciding on whether or not to let it through. We host a lot of websites, we do not accept any responsibilty for nor filter content. If there is a problem, we deal with it. If we did filter or censor, we could become legally liable for content. We pay quite a bit of money to a well known company to provide virus scanning for our customers. A major reason that we pay is that as long as we make sure our system works, they would likely be liable for mistakes. I'm sure that our mail system transfers at least 100,000 "viruses" a day, probably a lot more, but we are just a common carrier, unless you've signed up for virus scanning. Gadi made a good point about spam (or the lack of it) on this list and if there was some kind of filtering going on. I have a good spam filter and am good at picking out and deleting spam before looking at it, so I don't know if the list gets spam or not. I suspect that spammers don't want to send to lists like this, as they would have to fake an address from someone on the list (it is closed) and they would draw excessive attention to themselves from a community that knows what they are doing. If I where a spammer, I would definately try to avoid lists like this. Todd Burroughs --- The Internet has given us unprecedented opportunity to communicate and share on a global scale without borders; fight to keep it that way.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists