lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: luke at normanonline.co.uk (Luke Norman)
Subject: Microsoft Coding / National Security Risk

>These people would be fully supported by Microsoft (including full access to
>all technical documentation, Microsoft technical advisors, etc), and backed
>by the NSA or other Government agency.
>
If this were to be undertaken (and personally I don't believe Microsoft 
would EVER allow it), would it not be better to have it backed my some 
worldwide agency. If it's a threat to national security, surely it's a 
threat to the national security of every country, and therefore a 
worldwide threat - surely better to have some agency spanning numerous 
countries, or at least consisting of representatives from numerous 
counties, rather than an american-backed project?
Luke



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ