lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <406175D5.8060309@normanonline.co.uk> From: luke at normanonline.co.uk (Luke Norman) Subject: Microsoft Coding / National Security Risk >These people would be fully supported by Microsoft (including full access to >all technical documentation, Microsoft technical advisors, etc), and backed >by the NSA or other Government agency. > If this were to be undertaken (and personally I don't believe Microsoft would EVER allow it), would it not be better to have it backed my some worldwide agency. If it's a threat to national security, surely it's a threat to the national security of every country, and therefore a worldwide threat - surely better to have some agency spanning numerous countries, or at least consisting of representatives from numerous counties, rather than an american-backed project? Luke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists