lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20040325120009.GB24228@suespammers.org> From: rodrigob at suespammers.org (Rodrigo Barbosa) Subject: PGP attachments (was: NEVER open attachments) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:14:10PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote: > inline signing sucks, because there are not many mailers which can > verify inline signings. Actually, there is a procmail workaround (for those who can use it) for this issue: # PGP :0 * !^Content-Type: message/ * !^Content-Type: multipart/ * !^Content-Type: application/pgp { :0 fBw * ^-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- * ^-----END PGP MESSAGE----- | formail \ -i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=encrypt" :0 fBw * ^-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- * ^-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- * ^-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- | formail \ -i "Content-Type: application/pgp; format=text; x-action=sign" } - -- Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob@...spammers.org> "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAYsnJpdyWzQ5b5ckRAtX+AJ9JvBpjHwh5atIZAY8y8od8Vlg4vwCfaQxp ibXbv7rYwn0A4uba5wO3C+E= =J//X -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists