lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4062F426.9060006@egotistical.reprehensible.net>
From: ge at egotistical.reprehensible.net (Gadi Evron)
Subject: One more Wack at the dead equine WAS: viruses
 being sent to this list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

As this email discusses me, I'll reply, inline, to what I must.

| And in a private email to Mr. Evron I pointed out how it was nice of him
| to be willing to be a moderator.

There are already moderators to this mailing list.

| Mr. Evron's reply was no.   He was not offering up his own effort to solve
| what he felt was a problem.

Our two-emails conversation was private, although I have no problem
being quoted, it is not very polite to quote/speak of private
conversations without prior permission.

This list already has moderators, and even if there weren't, I wouldn't
want the job and I doubt this list would want me. *yawn*

| The simplist way to kill a thread asking someone else to do a bunch of
| work is to ask the thread bringer "Will you do the work?"   If they are
| unwilling to do the work, what else is there to 'discuss'?

You obviously did not read my emails about how:
1. AV's would save moderation time, without false positives if used
    right (signatures only).
2. The rest: go read before you reply, or don't bother and zip it (or
    talk on, if you like, you are more than allowed to), but don't expect
    a third reply without specific point-by-point fact arguments or
    theoretical issues based on what was discussed.

	Gadi.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFAYvQPqH6NtwbH1FARAnudAJkBaJAPubfI7ej1JxwfK/WhceX5vwCfUW8o
ChXorK43lfo5GcFmeiIFB/Q=
=/XNj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Powered by blists - more mailing lists