full-disclosure - Signal to Noise Ratio for February

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200403251609.i2PG9nTF012279@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: Signal to Noise Ratio for February 

On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 17:56:09 MST, Epic <epic@...k3r.com>  said:
> Lately the SNR wouldn't allow for minimal communications if this were
> any communications infrastructure.

You'd be amazed what Shannon lets you get away with.

http://seti.sentry.net/archive/bioastro/2000/0147.html

-178dBm.  Yowza.  Need a really big-ass dish to find that signal. ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040325/30d7c77b/attachment.bin