lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20040331112048.06e4064a.volker.tanger@detewe.de> From: volker.tanger at detewe.de (Volker Tanger) Subject: SMTP Encryption (S/MIME) for Outlook question Greetings! On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:39:59 -0800 "Crist J. Clark" <cristjc@...cast.net> wrote: > Most email clients are pretty easy to use with respect to > S/MIME... Once you get the certificates installed. PKI. Managing > certificates for a decent-sized luser base is not fun. And from our experience S/MIME standards are just standard within the same product family. Outlook's S/MIME and Netscape's S/MIME won't work together the last time we tried. > > What do other Win/Exchange/Outlook IT admins use for S/MIME? GnuPG (OpenPGP standard) ? > > BTW, if there's something that will run on top of the SMTP gateway > > server or the internal Exchange server to encrypt the message before > > being routed to the Internet, this is also acceptable. A number of gateway servers. There is (was?) a software package from the GnuPG group. There is the T/Bone gateway (at freshmeat - and from http://www.bonelabs.com/). Utimaco has a crypto-gateway, too. Usually you'll want a single company-wide key when using a gateway to ensure confidential mail across the internet. This way you'll have plaintext emails via LAN though - if not using TLS. Bye Volker Tanger ITK Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists