full-disclosure - Re: SEARCH web attack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200404011230.29511.i_t@thum.ath.cx>
From: i_t at thum.ath.cx (i.t Consulting)
Subject: Re: SEARCH web attack

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am Mittwoch, 31. M?rz 2004 22:17 schrieb Jeff Workman:
> This looks like the IIS WebDAV exploit:
> http://www.whitehats.com/info/ids474

interesting link - thanks (and for all other answers);

"If you are. .. not vulnerable to sequence number prediction attacks, then you 
can be fairly certain that the source IP address of the event is 
accurate...."
well - then the verified ip-addresses (look like IIS-servers) are 
victims/attackers?
I'd very appreciate if someone could point me to a docu due to the question - 
why is it likely that the source IP address is not spoofed?

in April the string has slightly changed - shortened -
http://it97.dyndns.org/Security/exploits/
and Apache produces a 403 now
http://thum.ath.cx/Apache/code.403

- -- 
 . ___
 |  | 
 |  |  
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAa+9BXq0nBz/gMj0RAmOMAKDtUYahpP1TCpvJglU0IGiESMcrWQCggyYr
gg7T1TVeERl4N14zPIhLaNA=
=2ByE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----