full-disclosure - FD should block attachments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <406E7A47.6070008@home.nl>
From: niekbaakman at home.nl (Niek Baakman)
Subject: FD should block attachments

Paul Schmehl wrote:

> --On Saturday, April 3, 2004 2:30 AM +0200 Niek Baakman 
> <niekbaakman@...e.nl> wrote:
> 
>>
>> They have the choice not to sign up, and read the FD archives instead.
>> If you can't deal with the noise/virii/ect/ect that comes with an
>> unmoderated list, unsubscribe right now!
>>
> You're the second person that has suggested this.  I'm amazed by the 
> insensitivity.  If the shoe was on the other foot, would you be content 
> to peruse the archives?

Paul,

It isn't insensitive. If you really pay by the byte and FD is too much,
there are better ways to follow FD:

Read the archives. (Ok, not the most practical thing to do)
Subscribe to the moderated version of FD (can't recall name).
Read FD via webmail.

And the shoe was on the other foot once (fidonet ect).
I would be more creative to follow the list, if it was still on.

Regards,
Niek Baakman
-- 

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.
PGP KeyID: 0x65C28B9A   |    Fingerprint: 7A5301026E58CF3FACE7F2F0D82B854565C28B9A
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040403/aa590f96/signature.bin